The Evolution of a Cult can be characterized by specific steps.
A dominant personality or leaders introduce a new and transcendent idea offering a panacea for alienated and vulnerable people.
So here we are. Preparations are underway to storm the compound overseas. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the sidelines. An isolated player, vulnerable, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body as a statement, has emerged through the lines and is removed with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.
Do you recall the early days, when everything was fresh? The days of Bazball 1.0, of pure instinct.
Team architects offer a fresh beginning, optimism ahead, love, success together who all believe in the method.
What did it represent back then? Players celebrating enjoying success. Ink. Forearms. Determination. Confident masculinity. Oh sure, The team insist it’s not a real term, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?
Yet it’s clear the concept. It’s the batsman attempting a move so outrageous it defies description. It’s the thrill of Ben Stokes at his peak, an expression conveying: pensive Nordic god, beard made of wood, untamed style, truly contemporary you almost imagine to look down and find him positioned at mid-off bare-chested embracing nature.
It’s Ben Duckett often seen to talk in press conferences, appearing as a cheerful animal smartly dressed, uttering phrases such as we’re challenging norms. Indeed, the vibe, initially, was uplifting.
Building period. Cohesion maintained via memorization of mantras. These ideas may seem irrational as a loyalty check.
Is it just me? The criticism, the outrage, the disappointment after the first Ashes Test defeat seems too strong, too much. The batting collapsed during the match, as is typical there. They were dominated defensively in a short span as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, manipulated by Travis Head batting like England but better, adjusting to the pitch, a man playing with brilliance.
Currently, we see the criticism, the frustration, the view of the sport as a failure. The feeling seems to be that losing isn’t enough, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, destroyed, overwhelmed through sheer skill of the pace attack, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, out there celebrating achievements humbly as if receiving a nice new fishing rod. What will this do to them?
Challenges surface due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on hatred of the outside world.
Ultimately, half a week out from the second Test, we have now reached a critical juncture in the lifespan of this approach. Victory is possible in Brisbane in a blur of adrenal disruption. More likely, defeat could come swiftly. In case of defeat it seems we really might be entering the decline.
Prior to that, there are two things to note about this. Previously, during the initial excitement, of optimism and energy, an piece was published labeling it a movement. People were very angry, which was helpful because everyone knows the best way of proving something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages denying scrutiny of the philosophy.
What has happened in the last few days are equally notable. Criticism of the approach is now the trend. Online outrage is widespread, critical analysts, shots of angry middle-aged supporters abroad missing out on play, similar to people wanting fairness.
Conversely, there is the broader context of the opponent’s mixed ingrained annoyance towards the unconventional visitors, out there saying, hey, that thing you love and have developed as one way of separating yourself culturally from us, it’s not serious ultimately.
Here lies the truth. Everything is a cult. The style was a trend as the game has its own culture. In fact, English cricket has always been a cult, a circle, a garden party, an insular community with centuries of opaque and ritualistic cult history behind it. This has always been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the imperial sport of England, the original sports washers. And notably, the nation has its own culture, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a monarchy still exists.
England’s cricketers have been sealed up within this world for years. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are simply replicating their upbringing, creating another a bubble, a limited community, however with a modern squad and a leader who wants you to be yourself provided you conform.
Live where your feet are. Embrace challenges. Despite efforts, things stay similar.
Considering this, now is the time to offer compassion for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, which are significant. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with
A digital content strategist with over a decade of experience in blogging and social media.
Douglas Houston
Douglas Houston
Douglas Houston
Douglas Houston